Currently released so far... 5268 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AORC
AJ
AM
AMGT
AE
AU
AGMT
AG
AS
AFIN
APER
ABUD
ATRN
AL
AEMR
ACOA
AO
AX
AMED
ADCO
AODE
AFFAIRS
AC
ASIG
ABLD
AA
AFU
ASUP
AROC
ATFN
AVERY
APCS
AER
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AEC
APECO
CU
CO
CH
CDG
CIA
CACM
CDB
CI
CS
CVIS
CA
CBW
CASC
CD
CV
CMGT
CLINTON
CE
CJAN
CG
CF
CN
CAN
COUNTER
CIS
CM
CONDOLEEZZA
COE
CR
CY
CTM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CPAS
CWC
CT
CKGR
CB
CACS
COM
CJUS
CARSON
CL
COUNTERTERRORISM
EG
ECON
ETTC
EFIN
EZ
ETRD
EUN
ELAB
EU
EINV
EAID
EMIN
ENRG
ECPS
EN
ER
ET
ES
EPET
EUC
EI
EAIR
EAGR
EIND
EWWT
ELTN
EREL
ECIN
EFIS
EINT
EC
ECONEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELN
EFTA
EXTERNAL
EINVETC
ENIV
EINN
ENGR
EUR
ESA
ENERG
EK
ENGY
ETRO
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ESENV
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
IV
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IN
IT
ICTY
IQ
ICAO
INTERPOL
IPR
INRB
IRAJ
INRA
INRO
IO
IC
ID
IIP
ITPHUM
IWC
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ICRC
IMO
IF
ILC
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IL
IA
IBRD
IMF
INR
IRC
ITALY
ITALIAN
KGIC
KDEM
KTIP
KOMC
KNNP
KWBG
KU
KPAL
KGHG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KHLS
KSUM
KSPR
KJUS
KCRM
KGCC
KPIN
KDRG
KTFN
KG
KBIO
KHIV
KSCA
KN
KS
KCOR
KZ
KE
KFRD
KIPR
KPKO
KNUC
KMDR
KPLS
KOLY
KUNR
KIRF
KIRC
KACT
KRAD
KCOM
KMCA
KV
KHDP
KVPR
KDEV
KWMN
KMPI
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCFC
KTIA
KPRP
KAWC
KCIP
KCFE
KOCI
KTDB
KMRS
KLIG
KBCT
KICC
KGIT
KSTC
KPAK
KNEI
KSEP
KPOA
KFLU
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KO
KTER
KHUM
KRFD
KBTR
KDDG
KWWMN
KFLO
KSAF
KBTS
KPRV
KNPP
KNAR
KWMM
KERG
KFIN
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTBT
KCRS
KRVC
KSTH
KREL
KNSD
KTEX
KPAI
KHSA
KR
KPWR
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
MOPS
MARR
MNUC
MX
MASS
MCAP
MO
MIL
MTCRE
ML
MR
MZ
MPOS
MOPPS
MTCR
MAPP
MU
MY
MA
MG
MASC
MCC
MEPP
MK
MTRE
MP
MDC
MAR
MEPI
MRCRE
MI
MT
MQADHAFI
MD
MAPS
MUCN
MASSMNUC
MERCOSUR
MC
OVIP
OPDC
OPRC
OIIP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OAS
OEXC
ODIP
OREP
OFDP
OTRA
OSCE
OPIC
OECD
OPCW
OSCI
OIE
OIC
OTR
OVP
PARM
PREL
PTER
PHUM
PGOV
PINR
PINS
PREF
PK
PE
PBTS
POGOV
PROP
PINL
PL
POL
PBIO
PSOE
PHSA
PKFK
PO
PGOF
PA
PARMS
PORG
PM
PMIL
PTERE
PF
PALESTINIAN
PY
PGGV
PNR
POV
PAK
PAO
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRGOV
PNAT
PROV
PEL
PINF
PGOVE
POLINT
PRL
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PHUS
PHUMPREL
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PINT
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PECON
SOCI
SY
SENV
SA
SP
SNAR
SG
SCUL
SR
STEINBERG
SF
SW
SU
SL
SMIG
SO
SN
SHUM
SZ
SYR
ST
SANC
SC
SAN
SIPRS
SK
SH
SI
TS
TU
TX
TBIO
TW
TSPA
TH
TIP
TI
TRGY
TC
TR
TT
TERRORISM
TO
TFIN
TD
TSPL
TZ
TPHY
TK
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TP
UK
UN
US
UNGA
UNSC
UNO
UNMIK
UV
UY
UP
UG
USEU
USUN
UZ
UNESCO
UE
UAE
UNEP
USTR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNHRC
USAID
UNCHS
UNAUS
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06SANJOSE2617, CAFTA RATIFICATION ADVANCES IN COSTA RICA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06SANJOSE2617.
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #2617/01 3212050
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 172050Z NOV 06
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 6679
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 002617
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/CEN
SIPDIS
FOR UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE - A.MALITO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON PGOV KIPR CS
SUBJECT: CAFTA RATIFICATION ADVANCES IN COSTA RICA
REF: SAN JOSE 1792
¶1. (U) Summary. Although President Arias has made it a top
priority, Costa Rican efforts to ratify and implement CAFTA-DR have
proceeded at a slow pace, but are picking up speed. After more than
five months of committee deliberations, the President of the
legislative assembly (the Asamblea), with the backing of two-thirds
of the body, has finally given the committee a deadline of midnight
December 12 for reporting the ratification bill out of committee.
If this deadline is met (as we anticipate), then full Asamblea
debate will begin after the holiday recess in January, with the
first of two required plenary votes expected by mid-February. If
there are no glitches, this timetable could lead to the second (and
ratifying) vote in April, following mandatory review by the Supreme
Court in March. Ratification is just the first step, however.
Twelve of thirteen bills necessary to implement the treaty have been
introduced, but only three have been reported out of committee and
are ready for debate by the full Asamblea. End Summary.
--------------------------------------
COMMITTEE ACTION ON CAFTA RATIFICATION
--------------------------------------
¶2. (U) For more than five months Costa Rica's Asamblea has held
committee hearings on whether to ratify CAFTA-DR, taking testimony
from dozens of proponents and opponents. On October 11, the
legislature's international relations committee completed its
hearings in San Jose. After a one-day blitzkrieg of public fora
around the country on October 14, the committee turned its attention
to procedural motions and interpretive clauses intended to clarify
legislative intent. The committee has considered approximately 200
procedural motions, most of which were stalling tactics by
opponents. So far 70 interpretive clauses intended to clarify
legislative intent have been introduced in committee.
¶3. (U) Because of the delays, on October 31, the President of the
Asamblea, with the backing of two-thirds of the body, set a deadline
of midnight December 12, 2006, for the committee to vote upon its
recommendation. Under legislative rules, any interpretive motions
not acted upon by the deadline will be forwarded to the full body
for consideration later. Post believes a majority of the committee
will recommend ratification on December 12.
--------------------------------------------
THE ASAMBLEA RATIFICATION PROCESS AND TIMING
--------------------------------------------
¶4. (U) According to legislative and executive branch sources, the
full 57-member Asamblea (Plenary) is expected to begin deliberations
in January 2007 with the first of two required plenary votes
anticipated by mid-February. Disagreement remains regarding the
number of votes necessary to ratify the treaty. While many experts
believe a simple majority is sufficient, because some provisions of
the treaty require changes that opponents contend conflict with the
constitutional protection afforded to parastatal monopolies, the
Arias administration believes a two-thirds majority (38 votes) is
politically necessary to avoid a Supreme Court challenge and to
silence critics. The administration remains confident they have 38
votes.
¶5. (U) If the treaty is voted favorably, it will automatically be
submitted to the Supreme Court's "Sala IV" chamber for up to 30 days
for constitutional and procedural review. Following Supreme Court
review, the treaty would be returned to the Asamblea for a second
plenary debate and vote which should take only a few days. If there
are no glitches, post's best guess at this point is that CAFTA-DR
probably will be ratified in Costa Rica in April 2007.
¶6. (U) One potential glitch is the next round of public protests,
which may take place around the time of the committee vote (in
mid-December) or the first plenary vote (mid-February). GOCR
sources, pleased that the anti-CAFTA protests fell flat in October,
have admitted to us that broader protests, (e.g., bringing in taxi
drivers who could block streets, especially in San Jose), or more
intense protests (e.g., making more use of university students)
could be problematic. Another potential glitch is in the Asamblea
itself, where opposition parties, led by Otton Solis and the PAC
party, could flood the plenary debate with motions as a stalling
tactic. Based on media interviews since November 12, the PAC seems
to have chosen the plenary as its next battleground. The third
potential glitch is the Supreme Court, where opponents could bring a
number of challenges to the treaty.
-----------------
ENTRY INTO FORCE
-----------------
¶7. (U) Ratification is only the first step in bringing CAFTA-DR
into force in Costa Rica, however. The United States Trade
Representative (USTR) has identified 13 areas of Costa Rican law
that must be amended to bring the country's laws into compliance
with the treaty before it can enter into force. Twelve of the
necessary thirteen bills have been introduced in the Asamblea. Of
those, three relatively non-controversial bills have passed out of
committee and await action in the Plenary.
¶8. (U) Under Costa Rica's unusual legislative procedure, from
December 1 until April 30 the executive branch controls the
legislative agenda. This week the Arias administration announced
its first set of priorities for legislative action. Three of the
thirteen required CAFTA implementation bills appear on the priority
list: Priority #3 - Opening of the insurance market; Priority #7 -
intellectual property rights (IPR) reforms (the third of three
required); and Priority #11 - opening of the telecommunications
market. These three bills are considered the most difficult and
controversial part of the implementation agenda
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶9. (SBU) One political commentator described the CAFTA process to
us as a championship bout between evenly matched boxers. There will be many rounds, and (probably) no knockout by either side. The
illustration may be apt. The Arias administration got off to a slow
start, but has been gaining ground. As the legislative process
continues, the government will have to take more punches -- in our
view, more likely in the Asamblea than in the Supreme Court or in
"the streets". With sufficiently focused and determined politicalQleadership, post believes the Arias administration is up to the challenge of getting CAFTA ratified.
¶10. (SBU) The real challenge will be the race to pass all of the
legislation necessary implementing legislation before the Feb. 29,Q08 deadline. If the Asamblea ratifies the agreement in April, the
GOCR will have approximately 300 days to pass necessary legislation.
Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, and the Dominican Republic have all taken an average of 450 days (ranging from 396-478 days; in the case of the DR 438 days and counting) after ratification to bring
the CAFTA into force. The question remains whether the GOCR follows that pattern or emulates Nicaragua's example (which took only 173 days) of not rearguing the substance of commitments already included in the agreement.