Currently released so far... 5268 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AORC
AJ
AM
AMGT
AE
AU
AGMT
AG
AS
AFIN
APER
ABUD
ATRN
AL
AEMR
ACOA
AO
AX
AMED
ADCO
AODE
AFFAIRS
AC
ASIG
ABLD
AA
AFU
ASUP
AROC
ATFN
AVERY
APCS
AER
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AEC
APECO
CU
CO
CH
CDG
CIA
CACM
CDB
CI
CS
CVIS
CA
CBW
CASC
CD
CV
CMGT
CLINTON
CE
CJAN
CG
CF
CN
CAN
COUNTER
CIS
CM
CONDOLEEZZA
COE
CR
CY
CTM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CPAS
CWC
CT
CKGR
CB
CACS
COM
CJUS
CARSON
CL
COUNTERTERRORISM
EG
ECON
ETTC
EFIN
EZ
ETRD
EUN
ELAB
EU
EINV
EAID
EMIN
ENRG
ECPS
EN
ER
ET
ES
EPET
EUC
EI
EAIR
EAGR
EIND
EWWT
ELTN
EREL
ECIN
EFIS
EINT
EC
ECONEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELN
EFTA
EXTERNAL
EINVETC
ENIV
EINN
ENGR
EUR
ESA
ENERG
EK
ENGY
ETRO
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ESENV
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
IV
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IN
IT
ICTY
IQ
ICAO
INTERPOL
IPR
INRB
IRAJ
INRA
INRO
IO
IC
ID
IIP
ITPHUM
IWC
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ICRC
IMO
IF
ILC
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IL
IA
IBRD
IMF
INR
IRC
ITALY
ITALIAN
KGIC
KDEM
KTIP
KOMC
KNNP
KWBG
KU
KPAL
KGHG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KHLS
KSUM
KSPR
KJUS
KCRM
KGCC
KPIN
KDRG
KTFN
KG
KBIO
KHIV
KSCA
KN
KS
KCOR
KZ
KE
KFRD
KIPR
KPKO
KNUC
KMDR
KPLS
KOLY
KUNR
KIRF
KIRC
KACT
KRAD
KCOM
KMCA
KV
KHDP
KVPR
KDEV
KWMN
KMPI
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCFC
KTIA
KPRP
KAWC
KCIP
KCFE
KOCI
KTDB
KMRS
KLIG
KBCT
KICC
KGIT
KSTC
KPAK
KNEI
KSEP
KPOA
KFLU
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KO
KTER
KHUM
KRFD
KBTR
KDDG
KWWMN
KFLO
KSAF
KBTS
KPRV
KNPP
KNAR
KWMM
KERG
KFIN
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTBT
KCRS
KRVC
KSTH
KREL
KNSD
KTEX
KPAI
KHSA
KR
KPWR
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
MOPS
MARR
MNUC
MX
MASS
MCAP
MO
MIL
MTCRE
ML
MR
MZ
MPOS
MOPPS
MTCR
MAPP
MU
MY
MA
MG
MASC
MCC
MEPP
MK
MTRE
MP
MDC
MAR
MEPI
MRCRE
MI
MT
MQADHAFI
MD
MAPS
MUCN
MASSMNUC
MERCOSUR
MC
OVIP
OPDC
OPRC
OIIP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OAS
OEXC
ODIP
OREP
OFDP
OTRA
OSCE
OPIC
OECD
OPCW
OSCI
OIE
OIC
OTR
OVP
PARM
PREL
PTER
PHUM
PGOV
PINR
PINS
PREF
PK
PE
PBTS
POGOV
PROP
PINL
PL
POL
PBIO
PSOE
PHSA
PKFK
PO
PGOF
PA
PARMS
PORG
PM
PMIL
PTERE
PF
PALESTINIAN
PY
PGGV
PNR
POV
PAK
PAO
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRGOV
PNAT
PROV
PEL
PINF
PGOVE
POLINT
PRL
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PHUS
PHUMPREL
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PINT
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PECON
SOCI
SY
SENV
SA
SP
SNAR
SG
SCUL
SR
STEINBERG
SF
SW
SU
SL
SMIG
SO
SN
SHUM
SZ
SYR
ST
SANC
SC
SAN
SIPRS
SK
SH
SI
TS
TU
TX
TBIO
TW
TSPA
TH
TIP
TI
TRGY
TC
TR
TT
TERRORISM
TO
TFIN
TD
TSPL
TZ
TPHY
TK
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TP
UK
UN
US
UNGA
UNSC
UNO
UNMIK
UV
UY
UP
UG
USEU
USUN
UZ
UNESCO
UE
UAE
UNEP
USTR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNHRC
USAID
UNCHS
UNAUS
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07SANJOSE2070, COSTA RICA: INCHING TOWARDS CAFTA IMPLEMENTATION
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07SANJOSE2070.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07SANJOSE2070 | 2007-12-19 21:09 | 2011-03-02 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
Appears in these articles: http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-02/Investigacion.aspx |
VZCZCXYZ0019
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #2070/01 3532128
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 192128Z DEC 07
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9293
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHDG/AMEMBASSY SANTO DOMINGO PRIORITY 1572
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 002070
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA, WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC, AND EEB
PLEASE PASS TO USTR: AMALITO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL PINR ETRD CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA: INCHING TOWARDS CAFTA IMPLEMENTATION
REF: A) SAN JOSE 1975, B) SAN JOSE 1856
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Costa Rica's coalition of 38 pro-CAFTA
legislators (G38) has finalized two of the thirteen pieces
of legislation the GOCR has identified as required to
implement CAFTA-DR. The national assembly (Asamblea) is
working flat out, but that is not likely to be enough to
complete the other eleven bills in time, given the
Asamblea's cumbersome rules and the stubborn delaying
tactics of the opposition. Further complicating the
situation, the Ministry of Foreign Trade (COMEX) and USTR
have yet to complete implementation review consultations.
Debate-driven legislative changes in the Asamblea or
different-than-expected outcomes in the COMEX-USTR review
may present new obstacles to completing implementation on
time. In our view, prospects are slim that the GOCR will
achieve the March 1 deadline. END SUMMARY.
=================
GLACIAL MECHANICS
=================
¶2. (U) In order to understand the challenges facing the
G38, it is helpful to have a brief overview of Costa Rican
legislative mechanics. The Asamblea operates methodically
and deliberately due to a cumbersome, multi-layered system
of checks and balances. The principal elements of the
legislative process are (1) assignment to committee; (2)
review of amendments accumulated in committee; (3) first
plenary debate and vote; (4) second plenary debate and
vote, and (5) enactment into law. The second debate is to
confirm the voting in the first, but often takes place
after judicial review by the constitutional chamber (Sala
IV) of the Supreme Court. Some legislation automatically
requires Sala IV review. As few as 10 diputados may also
petition for a review, meaning that most legislation,
especially controversial items, face constitutional
scrutiny. In either case, the Sala IV has up to 30 days to
issue its ruling. If the Sala IV finds no fault, the
legislation moves to the second plenary for the confirming
vote. Disapproval by the Sala IV returns the bill all the
way back to committee for "correction." The PAC-led
opposition has vowed to take nearly all the CAFTA-DR
implementing legislation to the Sala IV.
¶3. (U) Normal Asamblea rules do not restrict debate on a
bill, allowing intransigent legislators to stretch the
process indefinitely. However, the GOCR has applied a new
"fast-track" rule (Article 41bis of the legislative rules
of procedure) which permits a supermajority of legislators
to limit the number of plenary sessions to 22 (with an
option for up to six more) on any given bill. In addition,
the Asamblea has created a "streamlined" mechanism whereby
bills can be assigned to a mini-plenary that consists of a
total of 19 legislators. These mini-plenaries have the
same debate and approval power of the full plenary.
=====================
SO, WHAT'S THE SCORE?
=====================
¶4. (U) With the above as background, this is the status of
the 13 items of implementing legislation as of December 18:
To be introduced: 1
In Committee: 1
In Plenary/Mini debate: 9 (8 under fast track rules)
Under Sala IV review: 0
Approved: 2
The approved legislation includes the dealer protection
(casas extranjeras) and anticorruption (codigo penal) laws.
==========
HOT ISSUES
==========
¶5. (SBU) In parallel with the legislative process, the
Ministry of Foreign rade (COMEX) and USTR continue their
implementaton review. COMEX reports that intellectual
proprty rights (IPR) remain a hurdle. Progress reportedly
has been made in reaching an understanding on the penalty
regime for IPR violations. A second issue is the lack of
clarity between the GOCR's existing law on biodiversity and
the proposed bill on patents. COMEX worries that
legislative efforts to amend the biodiversity law to "clean
up" any perceived contradictions with TRIPS or with the
patent bill will be extremely contentious and possibly
splinter the G38. Adoption of the UPOV convention is also
generating significant controversy, with one petition
pending before the Election Tribunal to hold the next
national referendum on this convention. (COMMENT: The
Tribunal is to rule on this in January. We expect they
will say no. END COMMENT.)
¶6. (SBU) Other key issues include opening the
telecommunications and insurance sectors, both of which
face vociferous opposition from some public-sector unions.
Members of the PAC-led opposition have told us that their
strongest opposition will continue to be on Telecom issues.
With the legislative and implementation review tracks
moving in parallel, there is always a risk that the content
of a bill in the Asamblea might veer away from USTR
principles, particularly when COMEX and USTR do not agree
on all issues. In addition, there are several CAFTA-DR
obligations that the GOCR will address through regulations,
such as SPS equivalence. While COMEX and the G38 have made
progress in moving the CAFTA-DR implementing legislation
through the Asamblea, the GOCR is still drafting the needed
regulations, which it hopes to conclude by mid-January.
============================
MARATHON WORK SCHEDULE . . .
============================
¶7. (U) The G38 is expending considerable energy to move the
legislation. Starting December 1, when the Executive sets
the agenda in the Extraordinary Session, the Asamblea work
schedule was extended to include evening and weekend
sessions, a highly-unusual step indicative of the Arias
Administration's intent to complete the legislation in
time. In public comments, both Arias brothers (the
President and the Minister of the Presidency) have stressed
the need to complete the Asamblea's work by January 15, in
order to allow time for the expected Sala IV reviews and to
complete final regulatory measures by March 1.
=========================
BUT A STUBBORN OPPOSITION
=========================
¶8. (SBU) Small numbers of hard-core CAFTA opponents
(including students and union members) continue to threaten
a few diputados and their families, picketing their homes
in some cases. Inside the Asamblea, PAC members often walk
out of the chamber (or refuse to enter), preventing a
quorum. The opposition also employs other familiar
obstructionist tactics, such as unleashing long-winded
diputado Jose Merino del Rio (Frente Amplio) for one of his
trademark six-hour filibusters, or dumping as many as 1000
amendments on bills under consideration.
¶9. (SBU) The PAC is under some pressure, including from its
own members, to stop blocking the "will of the majority"
who voted for CAFTA ratification in the October 7
referendum. This has opened some fissures in the party's
Asamblea faction, but PAC leadership remains determined and
disciplined. They acknowledge that CAFTA will happen in
Costa Rica, but they insist that meeting the March 1
deadline (which they see as artificial) is the GOCR's
"problem" and not PAC's.
=====================================
...AND AN EXHAUSTED, BRITTLE COALITION
=====================================
¶10. (U) The G38 itself faces internal problems, including
members' health issues (e.g., one legislator receives
cancer treatment early in the morning and then repairs to
the Asamblea to establish quorum in the afternoon) and
wavering coalition members, especially the problematic
Libertarian Movement (ML) party. With a two-thirds
majority required to overcome most obstacles or speed up
action, the G38 has precisely the needed number, with no
margin for error (or absence). All 38 members are needed
to be on hand, all the time, to establish quorum, and to
keep things moving.
¶11. (U) The expanded work schedule, longer hours, and tense
work environment have taken a toll on not only the
legislators, but also on exhausted Asamblea staff. It
remains to be seen how quickly legislators will regain the
momentum after the holiday recess. Our contacts report
that the Asamblea will work through at least December 21,
if not through December 24, probably returning on January 2
or January 7. Though the final recess calendar has yet to
be approved, our contacts report that the Asamblea will
more than likely work through at least December 21 and
probably return to work on January 7. That would leave a
mere nine days until the GOCR's self-imposed January 15
deadline, even working weekends.
=======
COMMENT
=======
¶12. (SBU) To its credit, the Arias administration is
maintaining a full court press and has not asked the USG
(or other CAFTA members, as far as we know) to consider an
entry-into-force extension. We expect such a request to
come next month. As we've noted previously (reftels), the
prospects remain unlikely for the GOCR to clear all
implementation hurdles in time. The timetable may be
technically possible, but it does not appear to be
politically feasible. On December 11, a former cabinet
minister told the Ambassador that there was "zero chance"
of the GOCR meeting the 1 March deadline. On December 12,
a senior opposition figure told us it would be
mathematically impossible to complete all the legislative
work in time (although quite possible, he said, with an
extension of two to three months).
LANGDALE